Rules/Eratta/Proposal/Opinion
I was noticing that a few of the older posts in the Main Courtroom actually seem to deal more with attempts to 'fix' the rules than with clarifying the rules as they are currently written. This leads me to two questions. 1) do we want to ID those threads and move them into this forum. AND 2) do we want to try to put a labeling system in place so that we can determine the nature of a post at a glance? , , , and seem like decent tags, though I'm certainly open to others - or to critiques if it seems like there would be problems with the implementation of such a system.

seconded.

I'd be in favour, if it weren't for the fact that I think that after a few posts most threads will qualify for several, if not all, of those tags. People ask about the RAW, find out the RAW isn't conclusive, then ask for opinions which more often than not lead to suggestions for houserules. If things are convoluted enough to warrant a ruling from Tsukaede or one of the devs, we'll be in the realm of errata. At the very least, questions about the RAW will often be answered with opinions and interpretations, not with definitive clarification. With regards to moving threads though, I believe anything that deals with rules should be in one fo the courtrooms, not the lobby. This place seems to be more about general questions - anything that addresses one or more rules is too specific.

The problem is that new posters will ask questions and will not put the tags.

I suppose that a moderator could go in and add the Tag to the post. We would have to put some clear guidelines on how to use the Tags. Otherwise, the Tags will just be confusing.